Congresswoman Cheri Bustos Highlights National Farmers Union’s Continued Opposition to Trumpcare

National Farmers Union: Trumpcare would force “individuals with preexisting conditions to contend with increased premiums, higher deductibles and longer waiting periods for coverage”

 WASHINGTON– Today, Congresswoman Cheri Bustos, co-chair of the Democratic Policy and Communications Committee, highlighted a new letter from the National Farmers Union and reiterated her opposition to Washington Republicans’ Trumpcare bill as a bad deal for hardworking families from the heartland.

Congresswoman Cheri Bustos issued the following statement:

“If you have a pre-existing condition, you should be deeply concerned by the news from Washington Republicans today. Instead of keeping their promise to protect hardworking men, women and children with pre-existing conditions, Trumpcare would deny them affordable coverage by forcing them into an unaffordable high-risk pool. Before this backroom deal, Trumpcare already posed a serious risk that could push hundreds of rural hospitals to close their doors for good, forcing millions of Americans from across the heartland to travel unacceptably far for both emergency and basic health care. As the National Farmers Union makes clear, the Upton Amendment does nothing to address the core problems of Trumpcare and actually makes things worse for hardworking men and women from small towns, farms and Main Streets across America.

“Midwesterners believe that when you look somebody in the eye and give them your word, you should keep it. Speaker Ryan said their bill ‘protects people with pre-existing conditions’ and President Trump vowed ‘insurance for everybody.’ By kicking 24 million Americans off their health care coverage and returning us to the day when insurers could discriminate against patients with pre-existing conditions, this bill clearly breaks both those promises.”

Below is the full text of today’s National Farmers Union Letter:


May 3, 2017

Dear Member of Congress,

I write on behalf of nearly 200,000 members of the National Farmers Union (NFU) who are engaged in all forms of farming and ranching. NFU has already spoken in opposition of the American Health Care Act (AHCA) because of the estimated 24 million Americans who would lose coverage as a result. The most recent amendment to the AHCA only moves further away from NFU’s member-driven policy of affirming “the right of all Americans to have access to affordable, quality health care.”

Farming is a dangerous occupation, ranking 6th in occupational fatality rates. The injury rate for agricultural workers is also 40% higher than the rate of all workers. Finally, the average age of farmers in the United States is over 58 years. U.S. health care policy must take into account the unique needs of the men and women who provide food and fiber for our country and much of the world.

Our current health care system is not without its problems, but progress has been made since the passage of the Affordable Care Act (ACA). The current structure of tax credits and premium subsidies help farmers maintain consistent coverage, especially during downturns in the farm economy. The expansion of Medicaid has proven beneficial to rural communities, where the rate of enrollment is higher than in urban America. The Health Insurance Marketplace, while certainly in need of stabilizing measures, makes coverage more accessible for many farm families.

The correlation between a strong Medicaid program and the success of rural hospitals has become evident during the influx of rural hospital closures over the last six years. Seventy-eight rural hospitals have closed since 2010 with over 80% of those located in states that opted out of the Medicaid expansion. With another 673 hospitals at risk of closure, the AHCA’s proposed Medicaid cap could have devastating consequences for rural communities.

In 2012, 75 percent of farms sold less than $50,000 in agricultural products and 57% had sales less than $10,000. Young farm families that don’t receive additional income or health benefits from off-farm jobs would find it extremely difficult to purchase health insurance. The proposed legislation would also hurt older farmers. Easing restrictions on what insurance companies can charge older customers will leave older farmers facing increased premiums of thousands of dollars, despite the larger subsidies some would receive.

The modified AHCA bill also has a significant negative impact on those with pre-existing conditions. It’s estimated that 40 percent of 50- to 64-year-olds would be denied coverage in the individual market without the Affordable Care Act’s protections for those with preexisting conditions. The waiver option would mean that a large number of farmers in many states would be forced into high-risk pools. This legislation is woefully short in funding for those high-risk pools, leaving individuals with preexisting conditions to contend with increased premiums, higher deductibles and longer waiting periods for coverage.

Affordable access to quality health coverage is a high priority for all Americans. As you consider how to best improve our health care system, we ask that you give serious consideration to the needs of farmers and ranchers. While there is certainly room for improvement in current policy, the American Health Care Act will only hurt family farmers and rural communities across the country. NFU requests that you oppose the proposed legislation.

We appreciate your efforts to provide all Americans with high-quality comprehensive health insurance. Thank you for your consideration.



Roger Johnson